• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
10.11606/D.2.2014.tde-20012015-164800
Document
Author
Full name
Luís Gustavo Casillo Ghideti
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2014
Supervisor
Committee
Araujo, Edmir Netto de (President)
Grotti, Dinorá Adelaide Musetti
Leal, Roger Stiefelmann
Title in Portuguese
Improbidade administrativa e a figura dos terceiros
Keywords in Portuguese
Improbidade administrativa
Servidor público
Terceiros
Abstract in Portuguese
A presente dissertação tem como escopo principal a análise da figura do terceiro, sua relação com o agente público para a caracterização do ato de improbidade e as cominações daí advindas, servindo como referência principal a Lei nº 8.429/92. O estudo parte da contextualização e definição de improbidade administrativa, visto que a norma é silente sobre a matéria, valendo-se o autor da doutrina e da racionalidade sistemática proposta pela citada lei para tal mister. Superada essa fase introdutória, os capítulos seguem praticamente a ordem cronológica disposta na regra, ou seja, são analisados: (i) os sujeitos passivo e ativo do ato de improbidade administrativa, dando-se especial atenção aos terceiros, (ii) os atos tipificados como ímprobos e suas especificidades, (iii) a obrigatoriedade do ressarcimento do dano ao patrimônio público e a perda dos valores percebidos em decorrência de enriquecimento ilícito, pontuadas, aqui, as medidas de indisponibilidade e seqüestro de bens, (iv) as sanções aplicáveis e (v) a prescrição das ações destinadas a levar a efeito as medidas repressivas. Com o objetivo de aprofundar o estudo e dar suporte aos temas intrínsecos de cada ponto acima delineado, foram abordados em capítulos próprios (i) a problemática da causalidade adequada, segregando a mera irregularidade da improbidade, (ii) o elemento subjetivo caracterizador do ato de improbidade administrativa e (iii) o litisconsórcio existente entre o agente público e o terceiro. Para todas as questões postas, além da doutrina e do texto legal, a jurisprudência serviu de importante ferramenta, sobretudo, nos temas mais intrincados.
Title in English
Administrative improbity and the third partys figure
Keywords in English
Administrative improbity
Law 8.429/92
Public agent
Third party
Abstract in English
The main objective of this dissertation is to analyze the relationship between public agent and a third party, especially when defining an act of improbity and its comminations, using law number 8.429/92 as main reference. This study initially sets a context and a definition of administrative improbity since the norm is silent on this matter. The author uses the above mentioned laws systematic rationality and doctrine. Going forward, the chapters practically follow the same order as in the rule, analyzing (i) passive and active roles in an act of administrative improbity, with emphasis on the third party, (ii) definition of improbity and its specifications, (iii) mandatory indemnity to public property and the loss of perceived value due to illicit enrichment, including measures of unavailability and sequestration of assets, (iv) applicable sanctions and (v) prescription of actions destined to enforce corrective measures. Aiming to deepen the understanding of the issues above, specific chapters were dedicated to (i) the problem of adequate causality, differentiating irregularity from improbity, (ii) subjective elements to administrative improbity and (iii) the union between public agent and a third party. For all these questions, jurisprudence was a valuable tool to complement legal texts and doctrine, above all in the most complicated subjects.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
There are withheld file due to requirements (data publishing, patents or rights).
Release Date
2019-01-21
Publishing Date
2015-01-23
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2020. All rights reserved.