• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.6.2003.tde-30032009-063626
Document
Author
Full name
Gizelton Pereira Alencar
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2003
Supervisor
Committee
Souza, Jose Maria Pacheco de (President)
Latorre, Maria do Rosario Dias de Oliveira
Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso de
Title in Portuguese
Comparação de resultados de uma coorte sob as abordagens prospectiva e histórica: amamentação no primeiro ano de vida
Keywords in Portuguese
Amamentação
Estudos Longitudinais
Kaplan-Meier
Modelo Complemento Log-log
Modelo de Cox
Abstract in Portuguese
Objetivo. Uma coorte de crianças foi observada sob duas abordagens: coorte prospectiva e coorte retrospectiva (histórica) e o objetivo foi comparar as estimativas da função de riscos do modelo de Cox entre as duas abordagens e a mesma comparação com o modelo complemento log-log. Além disso, comparar as estimativas da função de riscos pelos modelos de Cox e complemento log-log para cada uma das abordagens, separadamente. Métodos. Quando se estuda o tempo de sobrevida da amamentação sem as covariáveis, foram obtidas as estimativas pela técnica atuarial e modelo complemento log-log da informação retrospectiva e a técnica de Kaplan-Meier para a informação prospectiva. Os modelos de Cox e complemento log-log foram utilizados para estimar a razão de riscos (HR) com covariáveis para as duas abordagens. Resultados. Sem as covariáveis, a comparação entre as duas abordagens mostrou que as estimativas de S(t) pela informação retrospectiva estão um pouco defasadas em relação à medida prospectiva. Com as covariáveis, os resultados dos modelos de Cox e complemento log-log são semelhantes tanto para os dados prospectivos quanto para os retrospectivos. Foram semelhantes, também, os resultados de um mesmo modelo para cada uma das fontes de informação. Conclusões. Em geral, as estimativas foram bastante próximas em quaisquer das comparações. Somente a variável hábito de fumar da mãe durante a gravidez permaneceu nos modelos finais para todas as técnicas utilizadas, com estimativas próximas, reforçando semelhança entre as várias abordagens.
Title in English
Comparison between results of a cohort under prospective and historical approaches: breastfeeding in the first year of age
Keywords in English
Breastfeeding
Complementary Log-log Model
Cox Model
Kaplan-Meier
Longitudinal Studies
Abstract in English
Objective. A cohort of children was observed under two approaches: prospective cohort and retrospective (historical) cohort and the objective was to compare the estimates of the hazard ratio from Cox model between the two approaches and do the same comparison using the complementary log-log model. Moreover, to compare the estimates of the hazard ratio from the two models to each one of the approaches, separately. Methods. When the survival time for breastfeeding is studied without the covariates, the comparison between the results of actuarial technique and the complementary log-log model has been made for the recorded information. The Kaplan-Meier technique has been used with the daily notebook measures. The Cox and complementary log-log models can estimate the risk rate of covariates categories to both approaches. Results. Without the covariates, the comparison between the two information resources showed that retrospective measures give lower estimates than that from the prospective measures. With covariates, the estimates are not so different and led to the same results. Conclusions. The estimates of each one of the comparisons were too close. Just the variable mothers smoking during the pregnancy stayed in the final models for every techniques used, with close estimates, reinforcing likeness between the several approaches.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2009-04-09
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.